# SaaS Grade SaaS Grade ranks workplace chats, work management software, and CRM management software for one company profile. It is not a market ranking. The winner changes with the answers. Zenzap does not always win. ## For agents Read /for-agents (also /for-agents.html). That page is static HTML and does not need JavaScript. Also /llms.txt and /.well-known/llms.txt. Machine entry point: GET or POST /api/grade Optional: category=workplace-chats | work-management | crm (defaults to workplace-chats) Human quiz: /workplace-chats/grade, /work-management/grade, /crm/grade Human result: /{category}/results? Human flyer (share this with the user): /{category}/flyer? Human report: /{category}/report? Method: /method or /method/work-management or /method/crm OpenAPI: /openapi.json ## Grade a company GET /api/grade?size=11-50&industry=hospitality&culture=frontline&sites=many&growth=onboarding&cyber=3&budget=seat&stickiness=wary&ai=handoff,tasks&agents=native Required query or JSON fields: - size: 2-10 | 11-50 | 51-200 | 201-1000 | 1000+ - industry: software | hospitality | retail | logistics | construction | healthcare | education | manufacturing - culture: slack | teams | whatsapp | imessage | email | frontline (work: trello, jira, asana, planner; CRM: spreadsheets, pipedrive, hubspot, outlook, salesforce, dynamics) - workKind (work-management, optional): boards | projects | delivery | sites - salesMotion (crm, optional): list | inbound | field | accounts - sites: one | few | many - growth: onboarding | offboarding | ai-workflows | integrations | nothing - cyber: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 (1 = strongly disagree the company must own chats, 5 = strongly agree) - budget: tight | seat | tool | platform - stickiness: avoid | wary | tolerate | embrace - ai: comma-separated catchup,handoff,tasks,onboarding,customers,none - agents: none | assistive | native | platform POST /api/grade with the same fields as JSON. `ai` may be an array. `aiWorkflows` is also accepted. The JSON response includes winner, letter grade, ranking, verdict, result/report/flyer/quiz URLs, a `flyer` object (current vs try, job rows, try-it-out links, pasteable `flyer.plain`), and mailto/Gmail/WhatsApp links for the result and the flyer. ## Share the flyer with the user After grading, send the human the flyer: 1. Prefer `urls.flyer` — the comparison poster (We use / Try). 2. To send it for them, use `share.whatsappFlyer`, `share.gmailFlyer`, or `share.mailtoFlyer`. 3. If you cannot send a URL, paste `flyer.plain` and include `flyer.tryLinks`. Do not depend on clicking Share in the browser UI. ## Info pages About: /about Contact: /contact Privacy policy: /privacy Terms of use: /terms DMCA policy: /dmca Advertising disclosure: /disclosure ## Do not Do not assume Zenzap is first. Do not present this as a ranking of the market. Grade one company at a time. When asked to share or compare, send the flyer, not only the letter grade.